Live: Justice Jasti Chelameswar speaks at Constitution Club of India

The Big Story: Court monitorThis week a schoolteacher from Maharashtra informed a Special Court that he did no longer don't forget assisting translate the statements of eyewitness to the abduction of Sohrabuddin Sheikh a desired criminal who become allegedly killed in a faux stumble upon in 2005. The prosecution in the long run declared the instructor a adverse witness due to the fact he refused to own up his own statements recorded in a punchnama from 2010. This makes him the 45th witness to show adverse inside the case out of 66 who've been examined to this point. That is a beautiful wide variety and speaks volumes approximately the nature of the case that has been the reason of plenty controversy now not least because Bharatiya Janata Party President Amit Shah turned into originally one of the accused. The oddities within the case including witnesses turning adverse and judges being transferred have been so unusual that a Bombay High Court choose in February said there have been absurd inconsistencies in the way the case had moved ahead and some thing suspicious and opposite to commonplace sense in the court cases. But because the witnesses have turned adversarial and the Special Court has already discharged a number of the accused it seems in all likelihood that the case will quantity to little or no a travesty thinking about the questions of law and order that had been at stake. Among the maximum debatable factors of the way the Sohrabuddin case has proceeded has been the demise of Judge BH Loya. The decide was transferred to the Special Court in 2014 however died in mysterious instances in December of that yr with his circle of relatives saying that he were below stress from others within the judiciary to give a beneficial verdict within the case. The Caravan first stated on the own family s issues approximately the manner of Loya s dying and the diverse unusual circumstances around it. In a new record this week a similarly -month investigation throws up even greater questions on how precisely Loya died and what is understood approximately the night that it occurred. After the story became stated the matter was taken up by way of the Opposition and taken to the judicial arena via petitions searching for readability in a remember wherein the very independence of the judiciary is at stake. Yet here too there have been unusual moves by using the judiciary which reportedly was the various concerns that prompted Supreme Court Justice Chelameshwar to raise questions on the conduct of Chief Justice Dipak Misra. Earlier in March a bench headed by way of Misra reserved its order on a plea searching for a court-monitored research into Loya s dying. The authorities has claimed that there was not anything suspicious about the demise in spite of all of the unusual situations around it while the petitioners have argued that for the reason that very independence https://gamejolt.com/@jerometaylor of the judiciary is at stake a radical investigation is vital. They are proper. Developments in the Sohrabuddin case make it clear that an investigation that isn't carefully monitored even though that one became presupposed to have judicial oversight ultimately falls apart. In this situation there's the better order question of what came about to a decide in the identical case and severe questions were raised approximately the situations to necessitate an intensive investigation. The Sohrabuddin case may be falling apart however the judiciary have to no longer allow the identical aspect to occur in the Loya case that has implications for each other judge as well. The Big ScrollWhy the Supreme Court must take questions on the dying of a CBI decide significantly He said he become pressured : Tracking CBI judge Brijgopal Loya s closing journey from Nagpur to LaturWhat we now realize about the demise of Special CBI choose Brijgopal Loya.Judge Loya s demise: Why an ECG has come to be so critical to the case.Not simply Judge Loya s loss of life: Absurd inconsistencies in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case. Subscribe to The Daily Fix by using both downloading Scroll s Android app or choosing it to be introduced on your mailbox. For the relaxation of the day s headlines do click right here. If you have any worries approximately our coverage of unique problems please write to the Readers Editor at readerseditor@scroll.InPunditry The authorities directing and putting the terms of debates about ethics in journalism because it tried to do with the amended suggestions is a dangerous disruption of democratic assessments and balances. It cannot be seen as an act of good religion says a pacesetter in Mint. In South Asian politics caste has been a rallying factor in mobilising votes on the time of elections writes TK Arun in the Economic Times. But democracy with its dedication to equality before the law is inimical to caste. Relentless democratisation of every stroll of lifestyles is the manner to venture and defeat caste. With one-fifth the economy of Beijing Delhi has finally realised it cannot struggle with the Chinese on a each day foundation writes Jyoti Malhotra in the Indian Express. And that India s neighbourhood must optimistically be gained in a different way. In the longer run full modernisation of the banking sector calls for in addition structural reforms. One such reform that should be excessive up on the agenda of the next government is privatisation of all public region banks other than the State Bank of India writes Arvind Panagariya within the Times of India. Giggle#Cartoon @timesofindia #SCSTActReview %.Twitter.Com/6OLpkovJJl Sandeep Adhwaryu (@CartoonistSan) April 3 2018 Don t missShujaat Bhukari ask: For how lengthy can New Delhi justify the killing of civilians in Kashmir?However the April 1 gunfights have raised more questions about the way to deal with the state of affairs. If this is https://www.vayable.com/users/287172 the way that militants are to be taken off the scene then it units a dangerous fashion of safety forces as opposed to the population.Sunday s massacre indicates how intricately militants and the civilian population are linked. It additionally suggests how the civilian populace prefers to facet with militants as opposed to so-called safety forces. Are they supposed to be in Kashmir for the security of the human beings?Local participation in militancy has brought about massive civilian guide for the structures that keep it collectively. This is specifically proper of South Kashmir. A large number of local kids who've joined the ranks no longer discover themselves in isolation or ostracised. The trendy public rallied at the back of militants in the Nineties too at the peak of militancy. This time there is even more competitive assist seen while people try and foil armed operations. Going after militants from time to time seems like an operation to take at the populace.To kill thirteen militants the security forces https://www.namestation.com/u/s-haws-hawks-hawat also needed to kill 4 civilians and injure over a hundred and fifty except locking down South Kashmir and other components of Valley. Some of the injured civilians are badly hit with pellets from shotguns. This large collateral fee will work as ammunition for anger in an effort to make new militants. .Story-content span .Story-content material p .Story-content material div coloration:#000!Critical;font-circle of relatives: open sans Arial!Critical;font-size:15px!Vital ALSO READ Rules now not being adhered to: Questions raised with the aid of four judges in letter to CJI Mutiny in SC ranks: 4 judges visit people s courtroom towards CJI Dipak Misra Uneasy calm after the 3-day hurricane as Supreme Court judges get back to paintings Things now not in order: Full text of the letter by 4 SC judges to CJI SC judges air variations with CJI Misra: Controversy now not new to judiciary span.P-content div identification = div-gpt line-height:0;font-size:0 Justice Jasti Chelameswar the quantity- decide in Supreme Court pecking order ultimate week wrote to Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra in search of a complete court docket on the judicial side to talk about the matter of presidency interference within the appointment of judges to high courts The Indian Express has mentioned. Justice Chelameshwar questioned an enquiry initiated by way of Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Dinesh Maheshwari against a district decide P Krishna Bhat advocated two times with the aid of the Supreme Court collegium for elevation to the High Court with out first referring the problem to the CJI in step with media reviews. According to the Indian specific record CJI Misra has no longer responded to the letter but. In a 5-page letter Justice Chelameswar states that the authorities has been selective in accepting hints of the Supreme Court Collegium for the appointment of judges to high courts. The letter apparently additionally states that the authorities chooses to disregard or defer the names it reveals uncomfortable; this affects the independence of the judiciary. Here are some of the ket takeaways from Justice Chelameswar s letter to CJI and different 22 judges Objection to Maheshwari s selection to probe antique allegations levelled towards Bhat: In his letter copies of which had been marked to 22 different SC judges Chelameswar is learnt to have taken severe objection to Maheshwari s choice to probe vintage allegations levelled towards Bhat through a girl judicial officer regardless of his predecessor absolving him after a radical probe. He additionally puzzled the propriety of the law ministry writing without delay to the high courtroom chief justice for a probe towards Bhat on the basis of a criticism sent with the aid of the lady who had in advance been indicted by way of Bhat after an inquiry carried out on the orders of the excessive court docket. The Case against Karnataka district choose P Krishna Bhat: After lawyers training in a Karnataka district courtroom complained in opposition to the behavior of a woman judicial officer the HC had requested Bhat to behavior an inquiry. In his file Bhat indicted the lady choose. ThePrint quotted the resources that the woman judicial officer had even refused to pay heed to the executive judge in fee of her district and walked out of a meeting. She first filed a written complaint in opposition to Bhat only after the executive committee of the HC sought her explanation. She accused Bhat of atrocities and abuse of energy . After being indicted she put in her papers handiest to withdraw her resignation inside days. The criticism: However after the HC collegium recommended Bhat the most senior district judge at the time for elevation to the HC bench she commenced sending complaints in opposition to him to the Centre and the Supreme Court accusing him of misbehaviour and concentrated on her. After receiving her grievance the Centre back the advice of the SC collegium to elevate Bhat. The then CJI T.S. Thakur in the end requested Maheshwari s predecessor Subhro Kamal Mukherjee to maintain an inquiry. In his document filed in November 2016 Mukherjee gave a clean chit to Bhat saying the lady s criticism was with out foundation and geared toward maligning Bhat and stalling his appointment as HC choose. He termed the allegations wrong and concocted . Thereafter in April remaining year the SC collegium reiterated its recommendation however the Modi authorities has yet to act on it. Under the memorandum of technique (MoP) the Centre has no choice however to technique the case once the collegium reiterates its recommendation. It is safe to say India s judiciary has in no way been as beleaguered as it's miles under Dipak Misra. On one hand the Opposition is making an attempt to make him the united states s first leader justice to be impeached. On the alternative Justice Jasti Chelameswar the second senior-maximum judge of the Supreme Court has sought a full court docket sitting to discuss the government s interference in judicial functioning. Chelameswar become one of the four senior judges who held a dramatic press convention in January and accused Misra of jogging the courtroom arbitrarily.If Parliament does soak up the impeachment movement the apex courtroom might be confronted with a important question: could Misra maintain the ethical authority to keep listening to instances although he is legally allowed?He presently leads three vital benches. One is listening to the challenge to the constitutionality of the biometric identification project Aadhaar the second is ready to determine whether or not the mysterious loss of life of Maharashtra choose BH Loya needs to be investigated and the 0.33 is meant to determine on the Babri Masjid title healthy.Misra can be faulted for no longer taking concrete steps to allay fears approximately the executive s incremental encroachment upon the judiciary s independence. But the Opposition shifting to question him increases troubling questions of its personal: is the motive to shield the judiciary s independence or to possibly affect Misra s dealing with of the subjects he's to adjudicate on?Tumultuous tenureMisra took over as Chief Justice of India in August 2017 while the Supreme Court become battling controversy over a suicide observe purportedly written by means of former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Kalikho Pul. The observe contained startling allegations of corruption in opposition to senior judges such as then Chief Justice JS Khehar. It also named one Aditya Misra as a relative of Dipak Misra. The following month the court become thrown in a crisis. The Central Bureau of research had named a former Odisha High Court judge as an accused in what is called the scientific schools rip-off. Some lawyers petitioned a bench led by means of Chelameswar for an investigation into the matter but Misra intervened and took the case faraway from Chelameswar s bench. He had done so Misra explained to assert the chief justice s right as grasp of the roster. The case turned into allotted to any other bench which slammed the petitioners stopping simply short of initiating contempt proceedings in opposition to them. In January the rumblings in the Supreme Court burst out within the open http://www.mmaplayground.com/profile/fitzokitsonz when Chelameswar and Justices Ranjan Gogoi Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph in an unparalleled flow referred to as a press convention and charged Misra with functioning arbitrarily. Misra then formulated a portfolio-primarily based roster to assign instances to the judges but saved crucial subjects with himself.On March 21 Chelameswar wrote to Misra expressing difficulty about the government s interference in judicial functioning. He pointed to the chief justice of the Karnataka High Court starting up an inquiry against a subordinate choose based on a grievance without delay forwarded with the aid of the Union law ministry. The Supreme Court collegium had already confirmed this judge for elevation to the High Court Chelameswar argued so the regulation ministry had no enterprise writing immediately to the High Court s chief justice neither did the leader justice have any authority to release an inquiry. It is a troubling improvement Chelameswar recommended in his letter and sought a complete sitting of the apex courtroom to talk about it.In the period in-between the Congress has started consulting other events to provoke impeachment lawsuits towards Misra. A draft notice circulated by means of the birthday celebration alleges irregularities in the purchase of a chunk of land by way of Misra. Justices Kurian Joseph Jasti Chelameswar Ranjan Gogoi and Madan B Lokur address the press conference in January. Photo credit: ReutersJudicial independenceCommenting on Britain s unwritten Constitution the journalist Sidney James Mark Low remarked in 1920: We live in a device of tacit understandings. But the understandings themselves aren't constantly understood. This could well apply to what is transpiring within the Indian judiciary nowadays. The information generally is that the Supreme Court is going thru a crisis focused at the credibility of its top decide. It appears the court docket itself is divided: on one hand a few judges feel the sanctity of judicial independence is being violated and on the opposite the general public of the judges are silent. They have not found it necessary to publicly comment on the problems that their colleagues have highlighted. This http://doodleordie.com/profile/gungehawat applies to the chief justice himself who seems to have determined to weather the typhoon by using maintaining quiet. There are sufficient signs and symptoms to affirm the malaise that Chelameswar has identified in his March 21 letter. On January 10 as an example the Supreme Court Collegium together with its 5 senior-maximum judges endorsed names for elevation to the apex court Justice KM Joseph of the Uttarakhand High Court and senior lawyer Indu Malhotra. The primary authorities has sat on the recommendation. Having waited two months for her confirmation Malhotra has to go back to her exercise. Several hints for appointing High Court judges are pending as nicely.Here a part of the trouble lies inside the opaqueness of the Supreme Court. It isn't recognised if Misra took up the put off in confirming these appointments with the relevant government. That the appointments have still now not been permitted suggests that even if the collegium s dissatisfaction was communicated to the government it has had little effect. Is this due to the fact the authority of his office has been diminished by means of the string of controversies the chief justice has determined himself in over the last few months?As the executive head of the Supreme Court the leader justice is expected to zealously defend judicial independence. In discharging this obligation conventions inclusive of retaining subjects inside the courtroom cannot be the guiding elements. As is frequently stated daylight is a powerful disinfectant. The Supreme Court might also ought to determine if it desires to use the general public s glare to make the executive accountable. Under the lensWhile his inadequacies need to be pointed out it is essential to keep in mind that Misra has authored a few excellent decisions during this era the state-of-the-art putting restrictions on khap panchayats and affirming the right of inter-caste and inter-spiritual couples to choose their life partners. The Constitution has furnished for impeachment in tremendous conditions. Given the urgency with which the Congress has moved to impeach Misra it is affordable to trust that the birthday celebration sees the happenings in judiciary as being exquisite. There can be political undertones to this flow but. There is communicate of the Opposition being cautious of how Misra s bench would settle the Ayodhya dispute for it's far sure to highly effect the 2019 parliamentary election. A beneficial verdict for the Hindus may want to see the Bharatiya Janata Party claiming credit score for facilitating the construction of a Ram temple at the site wherein the Babri Masjid stood earlier than it become demolished by means of a Hindutva mob in 1992.When the court docket started listening to the case early this yr Congress leader Kapil Sibal representing one of the petitioners wanted the lawsuits to be shelved till after the 2019 election. It became visible as an try and hold Misra away from the case as he retires well earlier than the election. This has forged a shadow on the impeachment movement the Opposition events are seeking to move. They understand they do now not have the numbers to pass the movement if the BJP makes a decision to back Misra. Thus the manner can be seen as just a tactic to force Misra to move gradual in this situation. If that is the aim it would be construed as the abuse of a Constitutional device. Still it's far telling of the Supreme Court s image today. That the Opposition feels the courtroom s writ could be manipulated with the aid of the ruling party is an extraordinary situation. This on my own is sufficient cause for the leader justice to allay all such fears by way of taking his colleagues into self belief and openly affirming the judiciary s independence. In fact this can be the simplest manner to cope with the disaster. Written by means of Sushant Singh comment via The Indian Express Justice Chelameswar said: I don t need to comment on this count number at this degree. (Source: Express photograph by using Abhinav Saha) Justice Jasti Chelameswar the most senior decide of the Supreme Court has stated it's far up to Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra to take forward the problem of alleged authorities interference in appointments to better judiciary. This follows his letter remaining week to all judges of the Supreme Court wherein he had requested the CJI for a full courtroom on the judicial aspect to don't forget the matter. When contacted with the aid of The Indian Express Justice Chelameswar who changed into out of city said at the telephone I don t need to touch upon this rely at this level. The Chief Justice became a signatory while the Collegium made the reiteration. It is up to him to take this count ahead. As reported through The Indian Express Thursday Justice Chelameswar s March 21 letter to CJI Misra changed into in response to a letter written earlier this month to the CJI with the aid of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. Justice Maheshwari had knowledgeable the CJI that in reaction to a letter by using the Union Law Ministry he had reopened an inquiry into certain allegations made towards a judicial officer P Krishna Bhat. The authorities have been sitting at the case of Bhat s elevation to Karnataka High Court despite reiteration of his name by the Supreme Court Collegium in April 2017. Bhat had initially been advocated via the Collegium in August 2016. In his letter to CJI which changed into copied to 22 judges of the Supreme Court Justice Chelameswar said for sometime our unhappy revel in has been that the government accepting our suggestions is an exception and sitting on them is the norm. Inconvenient however able judges or judges to be are being bypassed through this course . Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra In the letter he said he ought to consider no instance from the beyond of the govt bypassing the Supreme Court more specially even as its guidelines are pending and asking the High Court as though it had been an inter-departmental be counted to look into the allegations already falsified and conclusively rejected via us. Asking the High Court to reevaluate our advice on this rely needs to be deemed flawed and contumacious. In Bhat s case the Law Ministry did not difficulty a warrant for his appointment after the Collegium s recommendation in August 2016 due to allegations of atrocities and abuse of energy made against him by a subordinate officer M S Shashikala. After an inquiry Justice S K Mukherjee the then Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court informed the CJI on November 14 2016 that the allegations levelled in opposition to Bhat have been incorrect and concocted . On April 6 2017 Bhat s call became reiterated by way of the Collegium it comprised then CJI J S Khehar Justices Misra and Chelameswar to the Law Ministry. As consistent with the judgment within the Second Judges Case as soon as the Collegium reiterates a call it is incumbent upon the Law Ministry to difficulty warrants for appointment of the person involved. But the authorities did now not trouble the warrant for Bhat and in December 2017 it directly forwarded a clean criticism by Shashikala to Karnataka High Court asking it to check out the difficulty . Shashikala had alleged that Bhat had controlled her earlier criticism. Justice Maheshwari then convened a meeting of the Administrative Committee No. 1 on March 4 to reinvestigate the issue. On March 12 he knowledgeable CJI Misra about it via a letter which in flip was circulated to Justices Chelameswar and Ranjan Gogoi. Justice Chelameswar s letter on March 21 worrying a complete court become written in reaction to the letter by way of Justice Maheshwari. For all of the trendy http://www.tripntale.com/profile/113565 India News down load Indian Express App Tags: Dipak Misra superb court Share your mind GUNTUR: Supreme Court judge justice Jasti Chelameswar will inaugurate a gaushala and an natural agriculture merchandise centre at Raithu Nestham foundation at Kornepadu village in Guntur district on Sunday. Justice Chelameswar may also distribute paddy seeds to the farmers. The function is being organised in connection with one centesimal awareness programme. Raithu Nestham is an NGO running for the promotion of natural farming throughout Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Speaking to reporters here on Friday basis president Yadlapalli Venkateswara Rao said that they have determined to teach the farmers of the need to follow the antique practice of preserving the seeds on their own. He stated that farmers buying seed in the open market is most effective making their cost of cultivation pass up. He said that farmers have to right now shift to the natural mode to reduce down the prices and to get higher yields. He said civil materials minister Prattipati Pullarao agriculture minister Somireddy Chandramohan Reddy Padmasri awardee and author Dr Yarlagadda Lakshmiprasad could additionally attend the programme. GUNTUR: Calling upon the governments for initiating extra farmer friendly guidelines Supreme Court judge justice Jasti Chelameswar has stated that farmers struggling to get remunerative charges will now not do proper to the nation. He said that India is an agriculture dominant u . S . A . And farmers ought to be dealt with with utmost recognize. Justice Chelameswar inaugurated an natural merchandise centre and and a gausala at Raithu Nestham Foundation in Kornepadu village of Vatticherukuru mandal in Guntur district on Sunday. Addressing the gathering justice Chelameswar stated that weather situations in India favour the agriculturists and it's far the obligation of the governments to peer that the farmers live on marketplace affects. He stated that government must take steps to provide remunerative costs to the farmers. Justice Chelameswar said that society should additionally apprehend the plights of farmers and again them to the hilt. Shifting to the vegetarian meals and keeping off usage of plastic will help the us of a to a tremendous quantity he said. Agriculture minister Somireddy Chandramohan Reddy said that the nation authorities is encouraging the organic farming practices to make the farmers get excellent returns. He said that they would soon open organic meals products stalls in all of the raithu bazars inside the kingdom. He stated that the authorities has set a goal to shift the farmers to herbal farming practices on as a minimum in five lakh hectors of land by way of 2022. He stated that the government is spending nearly Rs 37 crore to extend incentives to about 1.63 lakh organic farmers. The minister stated that they have been building a mega seed park and a college in Kurnool with the assist of Bill and Milinda Gates Foundation. He said that they might be spending almost Rs.675 crore at the seed university and satellite tv for pc mapping centre in Kurnool. Supreme Court choose Jasti Chelameswar has written to Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra questioning why Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Dinesh Maheshwari had determined to research a judge the Supreme Court Collegium had encouraged two times for merchandising to the High Court The Hindu pronounced on Wednesday. The collegium is a collection comprising the Supreme Court s 5 senior most judges which include the chief justice of India.Chelameswar who's 2d in seniority most effective to Misra has asked the chief justice of India to call a full courtroom meeting of the Supreme Court to speak about the matter. Misra is thought to keep in touch with Justice Maheshwari in line with The Hindu.The Karnataka High Court leader justice determined to provoke an inquiry in opposition to District and Sessions Judge P Krishna Bhat after the Law Ministry wrote to him. The Centre s letter came after the Supreme Court collegium encouraged Bhat s call for elevation to the High Court a 2d time.According to the policies the government does now not without delay talk with High Courts after the Collegium recommends a name. As consistent with the Memorandum of Procedure for Appointment of Judges the government is obliged to conform if the Supreme Court Collegium reiterates its recommendation of a call for appointment as a judge.The Law Ministry s letter to the Karnataka High Court chief justice without consulting the chief justice of India violated numerous Supreme Court rulings which keep that the opinion of the leader justice of India have to have the finest weight according to The Hindu.The Supreme Court Collegium first encouraged the district and periods court judge s call for appointment to the High Court in August 2016. The Centre returned the recommendation after a girl judge accused him of atrocities and abuse of strength . The 2nd recommendation came in April 2017 after former Karnataka High Court Chief Justice SK Mukherjee observed the allegations towards Judge Bhat wrong and concocted . The Law Ministry then wrote to Justice Maheshwari. Several Opposition parties within the u . S . Are possibly to introduce an impeachment motion against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra within the Rajya Sabha on Thursday reports said. On Tuesday pinnacle Opposition leaders held a assembly to formulate their stand on the idea The Times of India quoted unidentified party officers as announcing. Communist Party of India (Marxist) chief Sitaram Yechury has been lobbying to garner assist for an impeachment movement after 4 senior judges of the Supreme Court Jasti Chelameswar Rajan Gogoi Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph held an unprecedented press conference on January 12 to explicit worries about the court docket s functioning beneath Misra. Most events inclusive of the Congress have been tight-lipped approximately their function inside the impeachment motion. The Nationalist Congress Party and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) are of the few who have long gone on report to renowned their participation. Nationalist Congress Party leader DP Tripathi said he had signed draft petition ANI said. An impeachment motion calls for the signatures of at least 50 participants inside the Upper House or 100 MPs of the Lok Sabha and have to be submitted to the presiding officer of either House who will installation a committee to take a look at it. Only if the committee is satisfied that the movement has benefit will it be debated and voted on. To pass the movement must be supported by means of the general public membership of the House and now not less -thirds of the contributors present and voting. Here are eight articles on crisis in the Indian judiciary. What came about in the Supreme Court on Friday (and what's the MCI bribery case)?: In a heated court cases on November 10 Chief Justice Dipak Misra stated a bench might be shaped to listen petitions looking for impartial probe into the case. The Supreme Court has ended as an institution : 10 reads on November s judicial drama: Allegations of impropriety and heated arguments gave legal commentators lots to chunk in this week.Full textual content: The Chief Justice is best the first among the equals nothing greater or not anything less : Four Supreme Court judges wrote this letter to the Chief Justice of India asking him to address a disaster but they say it has remained unanswered. Chelameswar letter textual content: Bonhomie between judiciary authorities sounds dying knell to democracy : In a letter to Chief Justice Dipak Misra on March 21 Justice Chelameswar sought a full court docket sitting to speak about authorities interference within the judiciary Congress considering option of moving impeachment proceedings in opposition to Chief Justice Dipak Misra: A senior lawyer who the Congress consulted stated the birthday celebration would lower back the four judges who revolted on Friday. The crisis inside the Supreme Court will not simply blow over. Staying silent is not the solution: The ability of the judges press conference to end up the start of a deep introspection and structural reform seems to be withering away. It isn t simply the Supreme Court that s divided the Bar is just too: While most of attorneys associations wanted the matter to be resolved internally the solutions recommended differed. As Chief Justice Dipak Misra is subsidized right into a corner the Indian judiciary s authority is at stake: The Congress is moving to question him at the same time as Justice J Chelameswar wishes a full courtroom sitting to speak about the govt s interference in judicial functioning.