SC holds Navjot Singh Sidhu guilty in road rage case, spares him jail term

The Supreme Court today convicted Punjab Tourism Minister Navjot Singh Sidhu for voluntarily inflicting harm to a 65-12 months-vintage man but spared him a prison time period inside the 1988 street rage case and imposed a Rs 1 000 nice on him. A bench of Justices J Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul reversed the findings of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had convicted the cricketer-grew to become-politician for culpable homicide no longer amounting to murder and had sentenced him to a few years in jail. A1 (Sidhu) is responsible of Section 323 of IPC. Awarded no sentence however quality of Rs 1 000 for the offence the bench said while saying the judgment . Section 323 (punishment for voluntarily causing harm) includes a maximum jail term as much as 12 months or with a nice which might also amplify to Rs 1 000 or both. The bench however exonerated Sidhu s aide Rupinder Singh Sandhu who changed into additionally awarded a three-yr jail time period by means of the high courtroom within the case. We have absolutely reversed the findings as a ways as A2 (Rupinder Singh Sandhu) is worried the bench stated whilst acquitting him. The apex court docket s verdict came on the enchantment filed by Sidhu who had end the BJP and joined the Congress days before the Punjab Assembly elections final yr and Sandhu challenging the excessive court s 2006 judgment convicting them. According to the prosecution Sidhu and Sandhu have been in a Gypsy parked inside the center of a street close to the Sheranwala Gate Crossing in Patiala on December 27 1988 while the sufferer and two others were on their way to the financial institution to withdraw money. When they reached the crossing it changed into alleged Gurnam Singh using a Maruti vehicle found the Gypsy inside the center of the road and requested the occupants Sidhu and Sandhu to do away with it. This caused heated exchanges. The police had claimed that Singh changed into overwhelmed up by Sidhu who later fled the crime scene. The sufferer was taken to a hospital wherein he became declared dead. Sidhu changed into acquitted of the murder expenses via the trial courtroom in September 1999. However the excessive courtroom had reversed the verdict and held Sidhu and Sandhu guilty beneath Section 304 (II) (culpable murder now not amounting to murder) of the IPC in December 2006. It had sentenced them to a few years in prison and imposed a first-class of Rs 1 lakh every at the convicts. In 2007 the apex courtroom stayed the conviction of Sidhu and Sandhu in the case paving the way for him to contest the via-ballot for the Amritsar Lok Sabha seat. Former India cricketer and Punjab Congress minister Navjot Singh Sidhu has been acquitted underneath section 304 (II) (culpable murder no longer amounting to homicide and convicted underneath segment 323 (punishment for voluntarily inflicting harm) in 1988 street rage case via the Supreme Court on Tuesday. Navjot Singh Sidhu. File picture. PTI The pinnacle court docket fined Sidhu with none prison term and acquitted the co-accused inside the case of all charges. A bench of Justices J Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul pronounced the verdict on a move-attraction filed via the victim s circle of relatives in search of enhancement of the prison term to them. A1 (Sidhu) is responsible of Section 323 of IPC. Awarded no sentence but exceptional of Rs 1 000 for the offence. A2 (Rupinder Singh Sandhu) is acquitted the bench stated. The accused in the case are Sidhu who end the BJP and joined Congress earlier than the preceding Punjab assembly elections and is presently the Tourism Minister of Punjab and Rupinder Singh Sandhu who turned into also convicted and sentenced to a few years in prison. On December 27 1988 the duo who have been in a Gypsy got into an issue with Gurnam Singh over parking space in Patiala. Sidhu and Sandhu had allegedly dragged Gurnam out of his car and dealt him a sequence of blows causing Gurnam s death. When Jaswinder Singh who become with Gurnam attempted to intervene Sandhu had also assaulted him. Sidhu and Sandhu have been acquitted by means of the trial court in September 1999. However the High Court reversed the selection in December 2006 and held them responsible of culpable murder not amounting to homicide. They challenged this inside the Supreme Court which stayed the conviction pending the appeal in 2007. Punjab Minister Navjot Singh Sidhu convicted beneath segment 323 and acquitted underneath segment 304( (II) in 1988 street rage case by means of Supreme Court %.Twitter.Com/ogdFoBGM4V ANI (@ANI) May 15 2018 According to the prosecution the duo had an altercation with Gurnam near the Sheranwala Gate Crossing while the latter requested them to give manner to their car. Police claimed that Gurnam became beaten up by way of Sidhu who later fled the crime scene. The sufferer become taken to a health facility in which he become declared dead. Senior advise RS Cheema represented Sidhu and had wondered the proof brought on document by way of the prosecution announcing the maximum baffling and stressful issue inside the case is what we've on record with reference to the purpose of loss of life. The proof brought on file was difficult to understand indefinite and also contradictory. Cheema contended that the scientific opinion turned into indistinct. Updated Date: May 15 2018 12:19 PM Tags : #BJP #Congress #Cricket #Cricket News #Gurnam Singh #High Court #Navjot Singh Sidhu #Punjab Congress #Rupinder Singh Sandhu #Sports #SportsTracker #Supreme Court AMRITSAR: Cabinet minister Navjot Singh Sidhu had a close brush with a stray bull in the course of his Durgiana Temple visit on Wednesday. According to an eyewitness Deepak Bhandari who had followed Navjot Singh Sidhu When we got here out of the briefing room of Durgiana Temple Sidhu was sporting shoes and then unexpectedly from nowhere a stray bull came closer to us leaving all and sundry terrified. He added that Sidhu s safety personnel straight away frisked him away to protection. Though Navjot Singh Sidhu escaped unhurt as many as three reporters sustained minor accidents within the bull adventure. The incident has uncovered the negligence of Amritsar Municipal Corporation s failure to keep the roads free from the menace of stray animals. A neighborhood resident of Durgiana Abadi Sanjay Kapoor stated that this become now not the primary time that a stray bull had terrified the humans however it changed into a habitual count number. You (media ) people are writing due to the fact a cabinet minister and a celebrity is concerned else no person even writes such information he said. NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court nowadays reserved its judgment at the appeal filed via cricketer-turned-flesh presser Navjot Singh Sidhu tough the Punjab and Haryana High Court verdict convicting and sentencing him to a few years in prison in a 1988 road rage case. A bench comprising Justices J Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul reserved the decision after hearing the arguments. Senior suggest R S Cheema acting for Sidhu stated that the evidence added on report concerning the motive of death of the victim were indefinite and contradictory . He also stated that the medical opinion regarding the reason of loss of life of the deceased Gurnam Singh became vague . The bench also reserved its verdict on the attraction filed via Rupinder Singh Sandhu who along side Sidhu turned into sentenced to 3 years in jail by means of the high courtroom inside the case. Sidhu who had end the BJP and joined the Congress days before the Punjab Assembly election remaining year had in advance told the bench that the findings of the excessive court docket were based on opinion and no longer on clinical evidence. However the Amarinder Singh authorities had on April 12 favoured inside the pinnacle court docket the high court docket verdict convicting and awarding the 3-12 months prison time period to Sidhu who's now Punjab s tourism minister. The former cricketer had argued that there was ambiguity concerning the real purpose of loss of life of Patiala resident Singh. The recommend for the state had in advance instructed the apex court docket: The trial courtroom verdict was rightly set aside by the High Court. Accused A1 (Navjot Singh Sidhu) had given fist blow to deceased Gurnam Singh main to his death thru brain hemorrhage. The state had argued that the trial court docket become wrong in its findings that the person had died of cardiac arrest and now not brain hemorrhage. The https://www.docracy.com/userprofile/show?userId=0bl788kags1 suggest for the complainant had argued that Sidhu s sentence ought to be enhanced as it was a case of homicide and the cricketer-became-baby-kisser had intentionally eliminated the keys of the deceased s vehicle in order that he does not get scientific help. Sidhu become acquitted https://www.namestation.com/u/sha-wshaw-ks-hawat of the https://justpaste.it/1pdd2 homicide fees by means of the trial courtroom in September 1999. However the high courtroom had reversed the decision and held Sidhu and co-accused Sandhu responsible of culpable murder no longer amounting to murder in December 2006. It had sentenced them to a few-12 months jail and imposed a quality of Rs one lakh each on the 2. In 2007 the apex court had stayed the conviction of Sidhu and Sandhu inside the case paving the manner for him to contest the via-poll for the Amritsar Lok Sabha seat. As per prosecution case Sidhu and Sandhu were allegedly present in a Gypsy parked near Sheranwala Gate Crossing in Patiala on December 27 1988 whilst Gurnam Singh Jaswinder Singh and any other man or woman were going to the financial institution to withdraw money for a wedding. It was alleged that when they reached the crossing Gurnam Singh driving a maruti automobile determined the Gypsy inside the middle of the road and requested the occupants Sidhu and Sandhu to do away with the car for their passage. This brought about heated exchanges. The police had claimed that Singh become beaten up by using Sidhu who later fled the crime scene. The injured became taken to a clinic wherein he changed into declared lifeless. NEW DELHI: Fighting returned the Punjab authorities which had supported his conviction Punjab minister Navjot Singh Sidhu on Tuesday instructed the Supreme Court that the verdict sentencing him to a few years in a road rage case was wrong and not based on scientific proof.Mr Sidhu had allegedly hit a 65-12 months-old man Gurnam Singh on the pinnacle throughout an argument on a road in Patiala on 27 December 1988. Gurnam Singh died in health center. A key point of Mr Sidhu https://www.viki.com/users/s_haws_h_awksha_wa_t_732/about s defence has been to question the realization that the dying came about because of the attack.The trial court docket had cleared Mr Sidhu of the rate in 1999 but the Punjab and Haryana excessive court docket sentenced him https://able2know.org/user/hadupkone/ to 3 years in jail in December 2006. The Supreme Court had suspended the sentence the next yr.Last week the Punjab authorities had taken aback Mr Sidhu while it backed his conviction and contradicted his contention that Gurnam Singh had died of a cardiac arrest.Mr Sidhu fifty four had give up the BJP after representing Amritsar in Lok Sabha for two phrases whilst the celebration price tag to contest from the town turned into given to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in 2014. He had later joined the Congress a celebration that he had run down throughout the years he became in the BJP became as soon as visible to be angling for the Deputy Chief Minister s put up.Mr Singh became appointed minister Punjab s tourism and neighborhood authorities minister. But that function did not help exchange the government s stance in the Supreme Court Chief Minister Amarinder Singh later told newshounds that his government could not after having taking the road that he become guilty earlier than other courts contradict itself before the top courtroom.Mr Sidhu also told the Supreme Court bench of Justices J Chelameswar and SK Kaul that the three prosecution witnesses had spoken in one of a kind language before the trial court docket. Besides only two of the six individuals of the https://thefastdiet.co.uk/forums/users/s-haws-h-awksha-wa-tgmail-com/ clinical board had now not been tested as witnesses inside the case. The findings (of the excessive courtroom) have been based totally on opinion and now not on medical proof. There turned into no rationale for this form of an opinion senior attorney RS Cheema performing for Mr Sidhu told the top courtroom. CommentsThe former cricketer argued there has been ambiguity concerning the actual reason of demise of Patiala resident Gurnam Singh who had died after he turned into allegedly given a fist blow by using Mr Sidhu.Two docs who had been a part of the board were tested as witnesses in the case however the prosecution had no longer located on file any cloth to reveal that there had been deliberations among those specialists concerning the reason of loss of life. The deficiency within the scientific proof become writ huge he said in the course of the arguments which could continue the following day consistent with information company Press Trust of India.For the latest Election Results