Will Vinod Rai's hand-picked panel be independent is the big question

Ai is a retired bureaucrat, while Diana is a former captain of the national girls's group.Nobody is casting aspersions on Justice (Retd) Rakesh Sharma, Barkha Singh and P.C. Sharma, but assuming the independent panel cookie did collapse in that unilateral manner, misgivings might certainly surface.Clearly, except Rai, pretty much everybody is satisfied that Johri's continuance because the Board's CEO has end up untenable.Come to consider it, Johri hasn't even been suspended pending the finishing touch of the inquiry. So tons for good governance.In what is going to be seen as a associated improvement, Kareena Kripalani, head of the Board's internal lawsuits committee (dealing with sexual harassment), has resigned.While Kareena wasn't available for affirmation, at the least pinnacle sources stated she had installed her papers.The composition of the unbiased panel had, strangely, been introduced around 10.Forty five pm on Thursday. It became executed through a Media release from the Board.Questions have been raised over the timing, with some inside the Board suggesting it become planned. However, if the Union government could ship the CBI director on compelled go away properly after midnight (on Tuesday), then nothing stopped the Board from emailing a Media release at a much extra 'first rate' hour.Diana refused to take calls and didn't reply to text messages too, however this Reporter knows that a "difference of opinion" over the contents of the Media release, between Rai and Diana, can also have triggered the delay.The Media launch neither enhanced Rai's status a few of the affiliated country Associations of the Board and the sidelined office-bearers (appearing president Chandra Kishore Khanna, performing secretary Amitabh Choudhary, elected treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry), nor did it growth the aam aadmi's confidence inside the corporation.Diana's inventory, of course, soared.An unnamed woman's publish on every other individual's Twitter deal with, on October 12, positioned Johri in the dock. The hope is that the woman and/or others might come ahead and depose earlier than the impartial panel. Very widespread is that the impartial panel may want to "don't forget and/or probe all allegations of sexual harassment" towards Johri all through his innings inside the Board. He's been the CEO for two-and-a-1/2 years. Why very great?Because in February/ March a girl employee of the Board complained against Johri and end. Rai, one gathers, persuaded her to take again the resignation.A most influential person in the Board became additionally roped in to "type matters out."Word is that Diana had taken a tough stand back then too and her tough line function may also have compelled Johri to gentle a "written apology."Johri should were sacked outright/made to resign in advance this 12 months itself.There's plenty to ask: Why changed into Johri deemed indispensable through Rai in February/ March? Why did the workplace-bearers continue to be silent? Why does Rai nevertheless regard Johri as imperative? Why, indeed? Isn't the BCCI above individuals? Shouldn't the enterprise's picture and the public's perception of it be handled as paramount? Surely, it's well worth noting that, during the last years, Google has "sacked" forty eight personnel, including "15 senior managers," over sexual harassment "allegations."Google made that public around the time that Board issued the Media release on Johri.Ironic. Dailyhunt https://www.avitop.com/cs/members/zeeemuusin.aspx